1964 DKW Munga vs. 1960 Humber Hawk
To start off, 1964 DKW Munga is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Humber Hawk (73 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Humber Hawk should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Humber Hawk weights approximately 290 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Humber Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW Munga | 1960 Humber Hawk | |
Make | DKW | Humber |
Model | Munga | Hawk |
Year Released | 1964 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2266 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 56 L |