1964 DKW Munga vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW Munga | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | DKW | Mitsubishi |
Model | Munga | Celeste |
Year Released | 1964 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 45 L |