1964 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Ford Probe
To start off, 1996 Ford Probe is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Probe (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Probe should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Probe weights approximately 120 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Probe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW Munga | 1996 Ford Probe | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Probe |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 58 L |
