1964 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1996 Mercury Villager is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 690 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mercury Villager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW Munga | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | DKW | Mercury |
| Model | Munga | Villager |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2860 mm |
