1964 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1996 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 740 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW Munga | 1996 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | DKW | Toyota |
| Model | Munga | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 21.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
