1964 DKW Munga vs. 2002 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2002 SsangYong Korando is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 SsangYong Korando (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 755 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW Munga | 2002 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | DKW | SsangYong |
Model | Munga | Korando |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |