1964 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 DKW Munga weights approximately 210 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW Munga | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | DKW | Renault |
Model | Munga | Clio |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |