1964 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Ford E-250
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-250 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-250 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford E-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW Munga | 2006 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 132 L |
