1964 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1964 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Smart ForTwo (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 DKW Munga weights approximately 305 kg more than 2006 Smart ForTwo.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW Munga | 2006 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | DKW | Smart |
| Model | Munga | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 33 L |
