1964 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW Munga | 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | DKW | Mitsubishi |
Model | Munga | Outlander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |