1964 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2009 Toyota Tundra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 338 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 220 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW Munga | 2009 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | DKW | Toyota |
Model | Munga | Tundra |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 100 L |