1964 DKW Munga vs. 2010 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2010 GMC Acadia is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Acadia (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Acadia weights approximately 1032 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 GMC Acadia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW Munga | 2010 GMC Acadia | |
| Make | DKW | GMC |
| Model | Munga | Acadia |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5098 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1986 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1849 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 83 L |
