1964 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2012 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Buick LaCrosse (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 630 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Buick LaCrosse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW Munga | 2012 Buick LaCrosse | |
| Make | DKW | Buick |
| Model | Munga | LaCrosse |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5001 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1857 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2837 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 59 L |
