1964 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2012 Cadillac SRX is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac SRX (308 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 830 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Cadillac SRX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW Munga | 2012 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | DKW | Cadillac |
Model | Munga | SRX |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 308 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 79 L |