1964 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (113 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW Munga | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |