1964 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volkswagen Eos (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 395 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volkswagen Eos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 DKW Munga | 2012 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
Model | Munga | Eos |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4423 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1444 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |