1964 DKW Munga vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 658 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 DKW Munga | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | DKW | Cadillac |
| Model | Munga | CTS |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.3 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1768 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1442 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |
