1964 Ferrari 250 GTO vs. 1980 Zastava 132
To start off, 1980 Zastava 132 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ferrari 250 GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ferrari 250 GTO would be higher. At 2,953 cc (12 cylinders), 1964 Ferrari 250 GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ferrari 250 GTO (296 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ferrari 250 GTO should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Zastava 132 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1964 Ferrari 250 GTO.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ferrari 250 GTO (294 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 Ferrari 250 GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ferrari 250 GTO | 1980 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Ferrari | Zastava |
Model | 250 GTO | 132 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2560 mm |