1964 Ferrari GTO vs. 1950 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1964 Ferrari GTO is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,953 cc (12 cylinders), 1964 Ferrari GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ferrari GTO (301 HP @ 7700 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ferrari GTO should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 232 kg more than 1964 Ferrari GTO.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ferrari GTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ferrari GTO (255 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 1964 Ferrari GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ferrari GTO | 1950 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | Ferrari | Jeep |
| Model | GTO | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 255 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 878 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2040 mm |
