1964 Fiat Cabriolet vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Fiat Cabriolet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Fiat Cabriolet would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Fiat Cabriolet (62 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Fiat Cabriolet should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Fiat Cabriolet weights approximately 120 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Fiat Cabriolet. (94 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Fiat Cabriolet.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Fiat Cabriolet | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Fiat | Zastava |
| Model | Cabriolet | 102 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2160 mm |
