1964 Fiat Cabriolet vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1986 Ford Aerostar is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Fiat Cabriolet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Fiat Cabriolet would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Aerostar (99 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1964 Fiat Cabriolet. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1964 Fiat Cabriolet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 520 kg more than 1964 Fiat Cabriolet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Fiat Cabriolet | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Cabriolet | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 99 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 68.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3030 mm |