1964 Fiat Grand Break vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1980 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Fiat Grand Break (96 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Fiat Grand Break should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 80 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Fiat Grand Break (142 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1964 Fiat Grand Break will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Fiat Grand Break | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Break | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1951 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2530 mm |
