1964 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2000 GMC Safari is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1964 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1964 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 686 kg more than 1964 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Fiat Grand Break | 2000 GMC Safari | |
Make | Fiat | GMC |
Model | Grand Break | Safari |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2830 mm |