1964 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG X20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X20 (177 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1964 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X20 should accelerate faster than 1964 Fiat Grand Break.
Because 1964 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Fiat Grand Break | 2001 MG X20 | |
| Make | Fiat | MG |
| Model | Grand Break | X20 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 177 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
