1964 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2002 Renault Megane
To start off, 2002 Renault Megane is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Fiat Grand Break is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Megane (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1964 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1964 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 50 kg more than 2002 Renault Megane.
Because 1964 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Fiat Grand Break (142 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (128 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1964 Fiat Grand Break will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Fiat Grand Break | 2002 Renault Megane | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Grand Break | Megane |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |