1964 Ford Anglia vs. 1970 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1970 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1964 Ford Anglia. (40 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Anglia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 190 kg more than 1964 Ford Anglia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mazda Cosmo (134 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Anglia. (75 Nm). This means 1970 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Anglia | 1970 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Anglia | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 134 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2210 mm |
