1964 Ford Anglia vs. 1972 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1972 Mazda 1000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Ford Anglia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 1000 (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1964 Ford Anglia. (40 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 1000 should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Anglia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Anglia weights approximately 40 kg more than 1972 Mazda 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda 1000 (77 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Anglia. (75 Nm). This means 1972 Mazda 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Anglia | 1972 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Anglia | 1000 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 77 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2270 mm |