1964 Ford Anglia vs. 1972 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1972 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 1,428 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Nissan Bluebird (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1964 Ford Anglia. (37 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Anglia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 193 kg more than 1964 Ford Anglia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Anglia. (70 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1972 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Anglia | 1972 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Anglia | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1964 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1428 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 737 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2430 mm |