1964 Ford Anglia vs. 1992 Acura Integra
To start off, 1992 Acura Integra is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Acura Integra (168 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1964 Ford Anglia. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Anglia.
Because 1964 Ford Anglia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Anglia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Anglia | 1992 Acura Integra | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Anglia | Integra |
Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2560 mm |