1964 Ford Anglia vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Ford Anglia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 40 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Anglia weights approximately 20 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 MCC ForTwo (100 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Anglia. (75 Nm). This means 2000 MCC ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Anglia | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | Anglia | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 1810 mm |
