1964 Ford Anglia vs. 2000 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2000 Toyota Corona is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 1,800 cc, 2000 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Ford Anglia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Anglia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Corona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Anglia | 2000 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Anglia | Corona |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |