1964 Ford Anglia vs. 2001 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2001 Smart ForTwo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Ford Anglia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Smart ForTwo (74 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1964 Ford Anglia. (40 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Anglia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 70 kg more than 1964 Ford Anglia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Anglia | 2001 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Anglia | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 33 L |