1964 Ford Anglia vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1964 Ford Anglia. (40 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Anglia.
Because 1964 Ford Anglia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Anglia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (177 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Anglia. (75 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Anglia | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Anglia | 6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 177 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 64 L |