1964 Ford Anglia vs. 2010 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2010 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Buick LaCrosse (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1964 Ford Anglia. (40 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Anglia.
Because 1964 Ford Anglia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Anglia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Buick LaCrosse (233 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Anglia. (75 Nm). This means 2010 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Anglia | 2010 Buick LaCrosse | |
Make | Ford | Buick |
Model | Anglia | LaCrosse |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 233 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 5001 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1857 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 70 L |