1964 Ford Cortina vs. 1977 Renault 20
To start off, 1977 Renault 20 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Renault 20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Renault 20 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1964 Ford Cortina.
Because 1964 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Cortina | 1977 Renault 20 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Cortina | 20 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2670 mm |
