1964 Ford Cortina vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1978 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,244 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 35 kg more than 1964 Ford Cortina.
Because 1964 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Cortina | 1978 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cortina | Colt |
Year Released | 1964 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2310 mm |