1964 Ford Cortina vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 411 more horse power than 1964 Ford Cortina. (49 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Cortina | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Cortina | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |