1964 Ford Cortina vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2005 Smart Coupe is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Smart Coupe (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1964 Ford Cortina. (49 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Smart Coupe should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Cortina weights approximately 45 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Smart Coupe (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Smart Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Cortina. 2005 Smart Coupe has automatic transmission and 1964 Ford Cortina has manual transmission. 1964 Ford Cortina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Smart Coupe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Cortina | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Cortina | Coupe |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 730 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 33 L |