1964 Ford Cortina vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1964 Ford Cortina. (49 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Cortina.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Cortina | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Cortina | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 65 L |