1964 Ford Falcon vs. 1961 Volvo 220
To start off, 1964 Ford Falcon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Volvo 220 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Falcon (244 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Falcon | 1961 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Falcon | 220 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2890 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1015 kg |
