1964 Ford Falcon vs. 1970 MG 1100
To start off, 1970 MG 1100 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1970 MG 1100. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1970 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 MG 1100 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Because 1964 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Falcon (244 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 MG 1100. (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Falcon | 1970 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | Falcon | 1100 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2890 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 104 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 840 kg |
