1964 Ford Falcon vs. 1971 Renault 4
To start off, 1971 Renault 4 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1971 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1971 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Falcon weights approximately 50 kg more than 1971 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Falcon | 1971 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Falcon | 4 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2890 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 650 kg |
