1964 Ford Falcon vs. 1972 Saab 99
To start off, 1972 Saab 99 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1972 Saab 99. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1972 Saab 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Saab 99 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Because 1964 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Saab 99, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Falcon (244 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Saab 99. (167 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Saab 99.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Falcon | 1972 Saab 99 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Falcon | 99 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2890 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 20.2:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1150 kg |