1964 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1964 Ford Falcon. (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1058 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (525 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Falcon. (244 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications: