1964 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Tata Safari
To start off, 2006 Tata Safari is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2006 Tata Safari. (135 HP @ 5530 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2006 Tata Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Tata Safari weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Because 2006 Tata Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Tata Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Falcon (244 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Tata Safari. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Tata Safari.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Falcon | 2006 Tata Safari | |
| Make | Ford | Tata |
| Model | Falcon | Safari |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2890 cc | 1948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5530 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1920 kg |
