1964 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Falcon (244 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Falcon | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Falcon | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2890 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 20.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
