1964 Ford Falcon vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,776 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. (196 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.

Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (315 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Falcon. (244 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Ford Falcon 2009 Jeep Wrangler
Make Ford Jeep
Model Falcon Wrangler
Year Released 1964 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2890 cc 3776 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 282 HP 196 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 244 Nm 315 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 20.2:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Acceleration 0-100mph 8 seconds 11.2 seconds
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 700 kg 1950 kg