1964 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Audi TT

To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.

Because 1964 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Falcon. (244 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Falcon. 2010 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1964 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1964 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: