1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1968 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1968 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Mustang weights approximately 301 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford GT 40 | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | GT 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2750 mm |