1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 1980 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 weights approximately 6 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Because 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford GT 40 (85 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm). This means 1964 Ford GT 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford GT 40 | 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | GT 40 | SJ 410 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2040 mm |
